In the world of procurement and contracting for property management products and services, two terms often come into play: Request for Information (RFI) and Request for Proposal (RFP). While both serve as crucial tools in the procurement process, they serve distinct purposes and cater to different stages of vendor selection. Understanding the nuances between RFI and RFP can significantly impact the efficiency and success of any procurement endeavor.

Request for Information (RFI)

A Request for Information (RFI) is typically the initial step in the procurement process. It’s a document used by organizations to gather information, clarify doubts, and gain insights into potential suppliers, products, or services. RFIs are exploratory in nature and aim to gather general information about the capabilities, expertise, and offerings of prospective vendors. Initiating an RFI with several vendors is beneficial in “pre-qualifying” potential vendors for the upcoming bid process.

In the context of a commercial real estate landscaping contract, a property management company might issue an RFI to landscaping contractors to gather information about their experience, previous projects, available services, pricing models, and any specialized expertise they possess. The RFI might seek to understand the contractor’s approach to sustainable landscaping practices, their equipment inventory, and their availability to undertake projects of varying scales.

Elements of an RFI

The components below are essential for providing context, outlining expectations, and guiding vendors in their responses.
The RFI should begin with a brief introduction that provides background information about the organization issuing the RFI, the purpose of the document, and any relevant context about the project or requirement.

The RFI should also include a section for background information. This section provides additional context about the organization’s needs, objectives, and any challenges or constraints related to the project. It may also include information about the industry, market trends, or regulatory requirements that could impact the project.

The next element is the scope of work. The RFI should clearly define the scope of work or the areas of interest for which information is being requested. This section outlines the specific products, services, or solutions that the organization is considering and seeks information about.

To ensure both parties are in agreement regarding the information being sought, the RFI needs to include any information requirements. This section outlines the specific information that the organization is seeking from potential vendors. It may include questions about the vendor’s capabilities, experience, qualifications, technical expertise, pricing models, past performance, references, and any other relevant details. In some instances, it may be helpful to include a proposed budget so the potential vendors have clarity on the financial expectations and can choose to not participate.

The next element in an effective RFI is the evaluation criteria. While RFIs are typically non-binding and do not involve formal evaluation or selection of vendors, it can still be helpful to outline the criteria that will be used to assess vendor responses. This section may provide guidance on how vendors’ responses will be evaluated and what factors will be considered important in the decision-making process.

Before finalizing any RFI, it is important to conclude any instructions for how to respond, as well as any additional requirements concerning the needed products or services. This section provides instructions to vendors on how to respond to the RFI. It may include details about the format and structure of responses, the deadline for submission, the point of contact for inquiries, and any other logistical information that vendors need to know.

Depending on the specific needs of the organization or the nature of the project, the RFI may include additional requirements or expectations for vendor responses. This could include requests for specific documentation, certifications, or demonstrations of capabilities.

Renee Williams with CleanRight Services advises that you should begin your RFI process at least three (3) months in advance and provide your vendors the opportunity to present their expertise to you. This is important because it allows the vendors to display the specific services they can provide and the benefits they can bring to your property. You as the manager can then determine which vendors will be able to fit the needs of the upcoming RFP. Once invited to provide an RFP the vendor will craft a detailed outline and scope of work and can customize them to your specific property needs.

Finally, the RFI should conclude with a brief closing statement that thanks vendors for their interest and participation and reiterates any next steps or expectations for future communication.

Request for Proposal (RFP)

A Request for Proposal (RFP) is a formal invitation for vendors to submit detailed proposals outlining their solution or approach to fulfilling a specific need or requirement. Unlike RFIs, RFPs are more detailed and specific, providing vendors with comprehensive information about the project scope, objectives, evaluation criteria, and contractual terms.

Continuing with the example of the commercial real estate landscaping contract, once the property management company has gathered sufficient information through the RFI process and defined its requirements, it may issue an RFP to a select group of landscaping contractors. The RFP document would include detailed specifications for the landscaping project, such as the desired services, project timeline, budget constraints, insurance requirements, and performance metrics. Contractors are expected to respond with comprehensive proposals that address each element outlined in the RFP.

Elements of an RFP

The RFP is a more detailed and formal document compared to the RFI. It serves the purpose of soliciting detailed proposals from potential vendors that outline their approach to fulfilling specific project requirements.

While both an RFI and an RFP have introductions, in an RFP, the introduction often includes more specific details about the project’s objectives, scope, timeline, and desired outcomes compared to an RFI.

The project overview is likewise more detailed and specific compared to an RFI. It outlines the project’s scope and requirements in greater depth to guide vendors in preparing their proposals.

Next are the technical requirements of the scope. While these may also be present in an RFI, you will find that in the RFP, these are not only more details, but they are also often more prescriptive to ensure that service partners understand the project’s technical aspects thoroughly.

In an RFP the evaluation criteria are also different. The criteria are more formalized and specific, providing vendors with clear guidance on how their proposals will be assessed. These requirements are further expanded in the format and content requirements which are more detailed and stringent. The RFP’s format and content requirements will now be presented with an expectation that vendors adhere more closely to these requirements when submitting their proposals.

A more distinguishing feature of an RFP is the contractual terms and conditions. This section outlines the contractual terms and conditions that will govern the relationship between the organization and the selected vendor. It may include terms related to pricing, payment terms, warranties, intellectual property rights, and any other legal considerations.

Neschune Henry with Lincoln Property Company shared her insight into the RFI and RFP process.

“The Request For Information (RFI) and the Request For Proposal (RFP) processes are different. As the name suggests, when an RFI is initiated, you are seeking information or clarity on goods, services, products, etc. I have seen the RFI process used when working with an architect and General Contractors (GC) on construction projects. On occasion, the GC may need clarification on a portion of the drawing or diagram which is vague and may be left up to the GC’s interpretation. In this case, the GC will submit an RFI to the architect to request additional information to clarify the item identified in the construction Plan.

On the other hand, I have used an RFP when bidding out specific services, for example, janitorial, window cleaning, landscaping, parking services, etc. During this process, a formal request is submitted to the vendors requesting pricing for these services. When submitting the RFP, I try to include at minimum the project name/address/location, detailed scope of work, RFP submission date, and the format that the RFP should be submitted (hand delivery, FedEx, email). A site visit is very crucial based on the project being priced. This provides a level playing field for all the vendors who will be involved in the process and allows the vendors to contribute recommendations that will add value to your property.”

Like the RFI, you should also include instructions for submitting the proposal, being sure to include details about the submission deadline, the method of submission, the point of contact for inquiries, and any other logistical information. Unlike the RFI, these instructions are more detailed and specific to ensure that vendors comply with the requirements.

When to Use an RFI or RFP

Remember, the primary purpose of an RFI is to gather information and assess the capabilities of potential vendors, whereas an RFP aims to solicit detailed proposals tailored to meet specific project requirements.
RFIs are generally more high-level and exploratory, whereas RFPs provide detailed project specifications and contractual terms.
During procurement, RFIs are typically issued early to gather information and inform decision-making, while RFPs are issued after requirements have been clearly defined and the organization is ready to solicit formal proposals.

There should also be different expectations for responses to each. RFI responses are usually brief and informative, providing an overview of the vendor’s capabilities. In contrast, RFP responses are expected to be comprehensive, addressing all requirements outlined in the solicitation document.

While both RFIs and RFPs play essential roles in the procurement process, they serve distinct purposes and cater to different stages of vendor selection. RFIs help organizations gather information and assess potential vendors, while RFPs enable organizations to solicit detailed proposals tailored to specific project requirements. Understanding the differences between these two processes is crucial for effectively navigating the procurement landscape and ultimately selecting the right vendor for the job. While navigating these processes it’s important to ensure you’re following the terms of your management agreement.

To stay up to date on news and resources such as this and other topics of importance to the real estate industry, subscribe to the free CRE Insight Journal Newsletter using this link.